Nathan Nicholson was the top salesperson at his company but had very little to show for it. His retirement fund? It wasnβt doing anything for him today, so he did something most would call βcrazyβ: he cashed it out. And it was the best move he couldβve made, as itβs helped him buy 23 rental properties and generate well over $100,000 a year in true cash flow!
Nathanβs using an investing strategy that any investor can copy: buy small (and affordable) properties, fix them up, and rent them out. Itβs simple, itβs boring, and itβs exactly how heβs making six figures in annual cash flow. But thereβs another wrinkle to Nathanβs story: he only lives on his W-2 income, which means 100% of his rental cash flow gets reinvested back into his business.
Now, heβs focused on optimizing his properties for even more cash flow, and in this episode, he shares the four levers heβs pulling to do just that. Whether youβre looking to scale your real estate portfolio or stabilize the properties you already own, Nathanβs slow, patient, conservative approach to real estate investing is a winning formula in 2026!
Click hereΒ to listen on Apple Podcasts.
Listen to the Podcast Here
Read the Transcript Here
Dave:
When Nathan Nicholson cashed in his 401k to start buying real estate, people told him he would fail. They said heβd lose everything. But today he owns 23 rental properties generating more than $100,000 in annual cash flow. Nathan was 33 and the top salesperson at his company, but years of top performance still left him with only $30,000 in his savings account, hardly enough to dream about retirement. So Nathan liquidated his retirement fund and he started buying rental properties in his hometown of Louisville, Kentucky. They were little brick houses, most of them under a hundred grand. That was 13 years ago. Now, Nathan generates six figures every year after all his bills are paid and his financial future is secure. Itβs a simple formula. Buy the smallest house possible, fix it up, and watch the monthly rent checks roll in. Nathanβs approach is so boring that he actually calls himself the tortoise, but donβt let that confuse you.
This strategy absolutely works. And today heβs sharing his exact repeatable formula. The one rule he never breaks, how heβs managed to pay off 10 properties even as he scales, and how heβs pivoted his strategy for 2026. Whatβs up everyone? Iβm Dave Meyer, chief investment officer at BiggerPockets. Thank you all for being here. We got a great show for you today. Weβre bringing on Nathan Nicholson, who is one of the most popular BiggerPockets guests in 2025. You can hear his full story by going back and listening to episode 1132 from last June. But today heβs back with an update what heβs been up to, how heβs pivoting to make the most of current market conditions. So letβs bring on Nathan. Nathan, welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. Great to have you here.
Nathan:
Yeah, thank you for having me.
Dave:
Some of our audience may not have listened to your first appearance here on the show, so maybe just give us a little bit of background about yourself and your investing career.
Nathan:
Yeah, my investing career, I mean from the prior podcast, it was how to basically make money with $100,000 or less rentals in all honesty with you. And so realistically, my beginning has kind of happened with me really just realizing I have to do something different at the age of 33 being a top salesperson and only having about 30 grand in my checking account going, βMan, if Iβm really good at sales, what do I only have $30,000 in my checking account?β And going, βWhat can I do?β And I had a couple friends of mine basically talk about real estate investing and what they were doing. And so I sold my 401k off, took every penny I had, had a dream to say the least, and put all my money into real estate at that time and just kind of been doing it ever since. So thatβs been about 13 to 14 years at this point.
Dave:
Tell us a little bit about what your portfolio looks like here today.
Nathan:
Yeah, I mean, from the last time we spoke, itβs grown a little bit. Iβm sitting at 23 properties, all single family residence at this point, and about to pay off my 11th house, so Iβve got 10 free and clear.
Dave:
Oh, wow.
Nathan:
And I literally sent the wire on Friday, so Iβm paying off a little two bedroom house thatβll net me about 600 a month. But beyond that, I mean, as far as my breakdown, my rents have gone up. My total cashflow has been going up because Iβve been trying to surify my property business, but my rents are at about 311,000 right now. Total cashflow. Wow. Thatβs total in is 143. And my true net, which is what I go by, I donβt say cashflow, Iβll go by true net. True net is $112,000 right now. And I think the last time we spoke, it was about a hundred.
Dave:
Is it fair to say then then you reinvest 100% of your cashflow back into some sort of business, even if itβs not, for acquisition of your next rental?
Nathan:
100%. Yeah.
Dave:
Is that hard for you? Do you ever get tempted to just live off of it or youβre still in growth mode?
Nathan:
I mean, Iβm the tortoise investor, right? Iβm very conservative. So to your point, Iβve thought about it. Iβm 46 years old. I would love to retire at 55. I mean, I could probably retire now, but at the same time, itβs one of those things where itβs like, I havenβt really accomplished really what I want to do yet. I think most investors will tell you the same thing. Itβs like I have not reached that spot and that spot is coming, but yes, thatβs what Iβm going towards. But at 55, I think Iβll be there. I really want to be at 30 doors and have about 20 of them paid off before I really go full on real estate. And thatβs at about 55 for me.
Dave:
Okay. I love the goal. It seems very achievable and youβre well on your way. Maybe before we talk about just what youβve been up to recently, you can remind everyone how you got here because this is where most people want to get to. 10 paid off rentals, incredible, nine grand a month in cashflow. Amazing. What was the primary strategy you used to get your portfolio to this size?
Nathan:
Being really safe is the best way to put it. I took a little bit of leverage in the very beginning. I took quite a bit of risk. I cashed out my 401k. A lot of people would tell you not to do it, but if you donβt have any money, itβs the only thing that you could use. You might as
Dave:
Well do
Nathan:
It because itβs the only thing you got available. And thatβs what I did, and it was very risky. And a lot of people told me that I would fail. I mean, itβs weird how your friends and people around you will say, βYouβre going to fail, youβre going to lose everything.β But in situations like this, if you believe in yourself, it really does help. And I mean, 13 years, 14 years ago, that was the catalyst. It was a dream and that and me cashing that 401k out and just playing it very conservative. I mean, Iβm a tortoise. I mean, youβll hear people use this analogy, turtle or the hair. I literally will not move forward unless I have cashflow to cover my expenses. And so Iβve really stayed true to that. And so that goes back to the first property. If you only make 300 a month, well, thatβs 3,600 a year.
What do I do with that? And you leverage it to 7,200 to 11,000 to 12,000 to 15,000. You keep slowly pushing that forward. And thatβs very beneficial. But thatβs why Iβve been able to do this at the rate that I have and actually have 10 to 11 paid off properties is because of following that same process.
Dave:
I love the philosophy. Subscribe to the same one myself. It sounds patient and slow. And youβre saying all the things I agree with that you should be slow and just take your time with it. But itβs really not that slow. You said youβve been doing this for 13 or 14 years. Going from where you were, which sounds like not a necessarily terrible place financially, but not where you wanted to be, and not having the level of savings that you wanted, not having the nest egg that you wanted, to being pretty darn close to financially free if you kind of wanted to go in that direction in 12, 13 years. Thatβs incredible. It takes most people β Thatβs
Nathan:
Very fast, actually.
Dave:
40 years plus to do that if you do it at all. So many people never accomplish that. So I think what weβre saying is patient in real estate is still faster than almost any other avenue to pursue this kind of financial security.
Nathan:
Agree fully.
Dave:
Nate, tell us a little bit about how you did the financing because you said you started with 401k, you cashed that out, you canβt buy 22 properties in that. So were you just saving in between acquisitions and reinvesting cashflow or was there something more you were doing?
Nathan:
In the 401k, I started buying the houses with cash upfront because my concept was a domino effect. I wanted the dominoes to fall in a way that made me more money. And also like a cat with a laser pointer, I wanted to have a toy to play with because I didnβt know what I was doing. I literally did not know. And so the best course of action was to pay off my first house and it was an estate sale for about $40,000, give or take 38. And I paid it off cash and it was livable. And then once I started running out of that cash, I started putting 20% down and I was doing renovation loans. Those are 203Ks in the mortgage world. A lot of people use those, and that helped me out with a couple of them at the very beginning. But then what I realized real quick was I wanted to have a better kind of loan set.
And so I started doing single family residence and using my personal credit and putting 20% down. So Iβm a staunch proponent of 20% down. Itβs almost one of the only ways you could cashflow a property properly right now is with 20% unless you get a really good deal on a bird deal that youβre doing.
Dave:
Youβve never gone and raised outside capital. Youβve just figured out a way to do it with a W-2 income β Correct. Saving and relationships with banks. You were able to just over 13 years build a very impressive portfolio, sort of the old-fashioned way.
Nathan:
The old-fashioned way. Yeah, correct. And I know a lot of people that do raise capital, and thatβs a very good way to go about it. Thatβs your lending structure. But what I figured out is you have to be a cash buyer to get these houses these days. And so my whole motivation once I figured that out was to pay my properties off as fast as I could because unlike a HELOC or a line of credit on a personal house, you could put it on your home and use it to buy houses and have that liquid, but you could also get business lines of credit, and thatβs kind of my focus of what Iβve done. So every time I pay a property off, I refinance it and put it on my line. It has zero money on it, but my line of credit might increase like this property Iβm about to pay off, Iβll get another extra $100,000 on my line of credit.
And then I have a million dollars in a line of credit on 10 properties individually in the line, and I could use that to buy houses as my own bank technically. Thatβs how I got around crowdfunding is literally doing it that way, slow and steady, but you can absolutely do that if you just take your time.
Dave:
We got to take a quick break, but when we come back, Nathan, Iβd love to talk to you more about what youβre up to today and how youβre making deals and your portfolio grow even during these challenging market conditions. Stick with us, weβll be right back. Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. Iβm here with investor Nathan Nicholson talking about his impressive career heβs built in Louisville, Kentucky over the last 13, 14 years. Now weβve alluded to it a few times. Everyone here listening to it knows it. The market has changed. Itβs different. And so tell us a little bit about your approach here in 2026. The
Nathan:
First thing I would tell you is I only really focus on a 1.3 DSER now.
Dave:
And
Nathan:
That is the very true number. That is kind of your new 1% rule is the best way to put it. A 1% is usually breakeven. 1.3, youβre going to make a couple hundred dollars off of it a month.
Dave:
And for everyone listening, if youβre not familiar with the acronym, DSER stands for debt service coverage ratio. It measures your debt service, basically what youβre paying to your loan company every month versus your income. Different investors have different targets, but it sounds like, Nate, yours is a 1.3. Some banks will lend on different ratios. 1.1 sometimes 1.2. Nate looks for 1.3. If youβre interested in getting a DSCR loan, thereβs all sorts of benefits to it. You donβt have the same level of underwriting. Sometimes it can be a lot quicker. If you donβt have a W-2 income, you donβt have necessarily the credit that most banks are looking for. These are loans that are underwritten like commercial loans, but are specifically designed for people like us. These are loan products created for our kinds of investors. If you are a pro member, we do have discounts on DSER loans.
You can go check those out from Kiavi at biggerpockets.com/pro. Go check those out. So Nate, 1.3, right? So thatβs your number. Thatβs getting you cashflow in Louisville. You finding 1.3 deals in Louisville right now?
Nathan:
Not really.
Dave:
Even though youβre not finding it, youβre holding the line at 1.3. Thatβs correct. So youβre not buying it still unless itβs the 1.3, thatβs the way you got to do it.
Nathan:
Yeah. You donβt want to lose money. And so a lot of people will tell you appreciation is an approach, and it is. It really is. I mean, you could get a 1% rule house, break even on it. It could have low CapEx because it has new features if youβre doing a bur or whatever that youβre doing, new floors, whatever. But at the same time, if youβre barely making it and you have, I had a house, a rat house, I call it the rat house. It cost me $27,000 to repair this house. So a normal person wouldnβt be able to absorb that. Thatβs a huge
Dave:
Hit.
Nathan:
And without cashflow, I wouldβve been hurt or anyone else wouldβve been hurt. So yeah, the 1.3 rule is really steadfast in my mind because thatβs whatβs gotten me here. Iβve really followed this approach from day one. But the other thing is the creative finance angle is some people like sub two. I personally am not a sub two person. I know a lot of people that have a lot of positive things that have happened to them by doing sub-two. I personally like owner financing on free and clear properties. I like doing the tricks that I just gave you with commercial financing. I like these little tricks because Iβm in control. That is the one thing. At sub-two, you donβt always have control. The ways that Iβm telling you, you have control. Your nameβs on the personal guarantee. You own the property, stuff of that nature.
Dave:
This makes sense to me. First of all, your affinity to seller financing over sub two makes sense to me given just what youβve told me a little bit about your risk tolerance in real estate. Yeah, exactly. I am not a sub-two expert, but there is some gray areas in sub-two that add risk. And it might be right for some people, presuming thatβs done ethically and legally. There still are some gray areas and those are things that you need to consider.
Nathan:
That is correct.
Dave:
When you do seller finance, if someone owns a property outright and theyβre writing you a loan, that is very low risk, very high upside in my opinion. And although theyβre not the easiest to find, theyβre out there. I hear investors doing them all the time. So are you just acquiring those the same way you would do a wholesale? Youβre doing direct-to-seller marketing, youβre sending postcards, youβre building websites. And thatβs why, as you said, getting in front of the deal, youβre trying to eliminate all the middlemen is essentially what youβre saying. Iβve worked with wholesalers. I have nothing against wholesalers, but theyβre charging a fee for their service as they should. Itβs a business. And Iβm paying that fee. So I donβt get the best possible price on that property because me, Dave Meyer, I am not willing to do the direct-to-seller marketing. I just donβt do it.
But you are saying by doing this direct-to-seller marketing, youβre getting 10 grand off every single deal, which is hugely appealing. So maybe Henry talks about it a lot on the show, but what amount of effort does it take you to do this direct-to-seller marketing? And what amount of money does it take you to do this direct-to-seller marketing?
Nathan:
I donβt spend a lot on the marketing. Itβs more for material like postcards, getting list created, stuff like that, AI to generate lists. And a lot of that stuff you could do very semi-cheaply. I mean, postcards, I just put an order in for 500 postcards and theyβre very niche, very specific. I design them myself. I do a lot of the work myself actually is the answer. And so I design my postcards, I put all the effort into it, I make the calls, I mail them out, I pay for the stamps. But in regard, the only other effort thatβs there is disposition. Itβs really just getting the information, calling the lead, having them call you, introduce yourself, and then handing them off to a partner that could do disposition. So really my focus is on less external effort because Iβm a growth manager for a large company and Iβm very busy doing that.
And also the fact of risk. Flipping would make more money, but itβs risky currently and wholesaling is actually less risky than flipping currently.
Dave:
It is. Yeah.
Nathan:
And it also gives me the time with my kids because I have two very small kids that are in travel sports. And if anyone knows anything about travel sports, oh my God, thatβs a lot of work.
Dave:
Taking all your time.
Nathan:
Thatβs right.
Dave:
So just to prove that, I mean, Nathanβs telling us that this is possible. If you want to go out and get the best possible prices, these are things that you can absolutely do. Weβre not going to get too much into the tactics here today, but we have tons of great episodes. Nathan obviously has some good advice. We had a recent episode with Andy Gill who was talking about this. Henry talks about it all the time, but this is just a way that you can absolutely get good deals right now in this current market. Itβs absolutely something that you should consider.
Nathan:
Absolutely.
Dave:
Nathan, one last question on this. Have you bought anything recently?
Nathan:
Yeah. Yeah. So thereβs two deals. One of them was a property that I got in late fall, and it was the property I was referring to a little bit earlier. It was a four-bedroom house. Rotor was trying to sell it, $125,000. I already had the drive-by done on this property, and I purchased it. And anyway, to praise for about $170,000, 175, which allowed me to immediately β
Dave:
Oh my God. I purchased
Nathan:
It with no money out of pocket. So youβre
Dave:
Just walking into 50 grand in equity on that?
Nathan:
Yeah, like almost 25,000. Yeah, right out the gate. And it didnβt make any money due to the current rent with the tenant, but in the last six months, I have raised the rent twice. Thatβs very not normal, but I had to start making money on this property. I was losing about $100 a month and he was paying 800, and now heβs at $1,400. So now Iβm making about $400 net a month after expenses in a period of six months with no money out of pocket.
Dave:
Is that 1,400 what market rent should be?
Nathan:
So actually itβs lower than market rent. And Iβm trying to help the family out. I met them when I walked the house and everything, and theyβre good people and they maintain the house. So I told them 1,400 was 200 less than what he would spend anywhere else, and he agreed. And so I left it there. And I didnβt want to lose him. Heβs a good, hardworking guy, and I didnβt want to disrupt his family, but I did let him know that obviously this is the pro and economy being an investor. I let him know I have to make money and this is where I need it to be. And he was able to do that, so it worked out.
Dave:
So clearly you figured this out, and these are repeatable things. These are things that really everyone listening to this podcast can go out there and do. Now, Nathan, you mentioned youβre not just looking for new deals, youβre also trying to optimize your business and to make more out of what you already have, which is the name of the game right now. I mean, I always want to go out and buy more, but thereβs so many things going on in the market that make it increasingly important to pay attention to your operations. What are some of the strategies and tactics youβre using to better your performance of the stuff you already got?
Nathan:
Shoring up the business is, I would say, one of the top priorities that I had this year and on my board behind me is making sure that my business is running efficiently and that I can maximize cashflow because again, Iβm trying to find ways to scale and build. So to your point, I mean, if my rents are $311,000 right now and my net cash flow is 112, well, the math that I did based on these four things that Iβm going to tell you that Iβm doing to shore up my business will increase my cashflow by almost 30 to $40,000. Thatβs not a small number. I mean, thatβs a lot of money.
Dave:
I mean, if you think of it that way, thatβs the equivalent of buying five, eight more houses. Absolutely. Everyoneβs focused on acquisitions. Just make your existing stuff do better and you donβt have to take on as much work or figure out the financing or go out and find the deals. So I see the motivation there, 30, 40%. I get it. How are you doing it?
Nathan:
Thereβs four things that Iβve really been trying to focus on right now. And it was property management, trying to figure out a way to get my costs lower, which at the time I was paying 12%.
Dave:
Oh, thatβs high.
Nathan:
But I did move property managers and I saved 4%. So right now Iβm
Dave:
Paying
Nathan:
Eight on my portfolio, and I feel like thatβs fair compared to everyone in the Louisville marketplace. And so I save 4% on $300,000 of rents. I mean, thatβs a huge amount of money.
Dave:
How did that conversation go?
Nathan:
It is a hard discussion in general because it was very hard moving my properties. Letβs be real. It was a major ordeal. And so I earn that extra 4% is the best way to put it.
Dave:
But that will pay dividends for years. Thatβs 12 grand a year thatβll compound for indefinitely. Thatβs
Nathan:
Right.
Dave:
And most things real estate, I talk about this a lot on the show, you get what you pay for. How has the quality of your property management changed, if it has, since moving to a less expensive provider?
Nathan:
So some things have changed, some things havenβt. I actually feel like theyβre doing a really good job at 8%. Heβs a local gentleman, has 250 to 300 doors. Theyβre on top of it. So actually, I feel like Iβm getting a lot for my money at this time. There are some different costs that Iβm paying currently, but I think theyβre doing a really good job in all honesty. And yeah, I do got to do some things outside of it, but at 8%, itβs worth it to me, in all honesty
Dave:
With
Nathan:
You. Yeah,
Dave:
Absolutely. Yeah, exactly. Itβs like, is that worth 12 grand a year? That little bit of doing stuff. And it sounds like the answerβs yes. Yes. That kind of sounds like a no-brainer to me. So I mean, thatβs a great thing for people to do. Just for our audience listening, audit what youβre paying for property management. Shop around, comparison shop with everything you do these days from contractors to insurance to property managers. Henry and I talk about this. The spread between quotes is astronomical these days. Itβs insane. Thatβs a 50% difference in property management fee from eight to 12%. Youβre paying 50% above market rate, and thatβs market rate. So youβre even going to a low cost provider. That happens all across the business. Yeah. Stick with us. Weβll be right back. Welcome back to the BigglePockets Podcast. I am here with Nathan Nicholson, whoβs telling us about the portfolio heβs built in Louisville, Kentucky.
Talked about deal-finding strategies and how he got started, but you said youβve really turned your focus to just optimizing and making the most out of your existing portfolio. So you said you were doing four things. Sounds like number one is you changed property manager. What was the next thing you did?
Nathan:
The second thing is that even in a market, and so Louisvilleβs kind of been depressed in rents, and I think other markets may have this scenario happen as well. Thereβs just less people renting these houses. Itβs kind of wild, but Louisvilleβs one of those markets. So I still had a rent increase at 3%. So on 23 houses at 3%, that raised me up another $8,000 a year right there. Weβve executed on, I think, 14 of them, and the others have leases, and weβre going to be executing on those in the fall, and theyβre still all under rented to the market. So the good news is Iβm not above the market, Iβm below it. And that will actually give me quite a bit of extra equity and capital as well per year. And so if people arenβt raising rents or they feel like theyβre under, I always keep mine a little bit under, but the reality of the situation is try to look to raise because rents have to go up.
I mean, taxes are going up, insurance is going up, liabilityβs going up. People are destroying houses at a much higher rate now for some reason. I donβt know why, but they were destroying your houses. So you have to ask for those rent increases every year and be very stout about it.
Dave:
Raising rents, obviously, if the market will bear it and itβs needed for your business, itβs something to consider, but sometimes the market wonβt bear it. You canβt just say, βOh, my expenses went up 3%, so Iβm raising rents 3%.β If thereβs competition in the market and someone can find an equivalent property without that rent increase, they might go do that. So it sounds like though youβve been able to do that without issue.
Nathan:
Pretty much all of them, except for one house is rented at this point. No one moved. The rat house is what I call it, the one that was destroyed. We put a lot of money into it and I tried to rent it at 1,150 for a two bedroom, 800 square foot in Louisville. And itβs not taken right now. Thereβs a lot of competition, and the house is updated and fully updated. And so Iβve got it at 1,050 and itβs still not going. So thatβs a $100 drop in this market on two beds in the last, Iβd say four months.
Dave:
Oh, wow. Okay. So
Nathan:
Yeah, the market is not bearing it at this point. Rents are dropping in this marketplace. So Iβm being very cognizant of that when Iβm asking for these rents. But if a tenant does come back to me and they negotiate, Iβm more than willing to negotiate in between. And I generally do that, but we havenβt had anyone really leave due to that because either itβs too much and they say, βHey, look, if you could take $50 off of the hundred that youβre raising it, Iβll stay and weβll just accept it.β So thatβs something that weβve been doing to keep people in there.
Dave:
I think itβs something for our audience to keep in mind, but you have to weigh in this market the risk of vacancy with the need to keep up with expenses because inflation is pushing up everything. Repairs, maintenance, taxes, insurance, everything, right? I agree. And as a businessperson, you have to keep pace with that. At the same time, tenants donβt have to pay. They donβt care what your business. They donβt care that your prices are going up. They have a budget, what they can afford, what they value your property at. And thatβs why you just canβt be overly aggressive. You have to find the sweet spot. 3% seems very reasonable to me. Thatβs basically the pace of inflation, so itβs not crazy. But I sometimes hear people say things like, βOh, my prices went up 10%, so I have to raise rents 10%.β You donβt have to.
And first of all, you probably canβt. There is a limit to what youβre able to do. So you need to really think about how much the market can bear. And that can be through conversations with your tenants, talking to other investors, talking to property managers in your area. But this isnβt just something like, βOh, I should go raise rents because I want to.β There is a consideration there, and I think youβre doing a very reasonable job with it, Nathan, and what I would recommend for the majority of investors out there.
Nathan:
Absolutely. All
Dave:
Right. So those are the first two. Whatβs the third thing youβve done to help your business perform better?
Nathan:
So Iβve been focused on paying houses off to increase my capital that I could use to buy houses off market. And wholesaling and stuff of that nature, you obviously have to be prepared to have cash. And so obviously the third thing is trying to find ways to pay off rentals quicker. And so what Iβve been doing right now, I actually wired $56,000 to the bank, and Iβm paying off a property on Lees Lane that will net me about $600 a month. So if you do the math on that, thatβs another 7,200 to $8,000 a year right there to just pay a property off. And generally what I do is I target the ones with the highest mortgage with the lowest cost to actually pay off. And so when I do the math on paying off Lees Lane, itβs going to return right around 10%, which is a really good return.
Dave:
Wow.
Nathan:
And thatβs why Iβm paying that one off. So thatβs the third thing that Iβve been really focused on.
Dave:
Tell me a little bit about just the strategy here, because what youβre saying makes sense. I agree with this approach entirely. But at the same time, youβve also talked a little bit about how you want to maximize the money you have for investing, right? Correct. And so whereβs this philosophy shift? Is it just market conditions? Youβre not seeing enough that you want to buy, so you have a little bit extra capital and youβre like, βWhere do I get the best return right now?β
Nathan:
So the reason why this makes a lot of sense for also helping me in investing, say, wholesaling or having cash to do that is because when I pay this house off, immediately Iβm going to add it to my line of credit. So not only do I get a paid off house that saves me $600 a month, but Iβm also going to put it on my line of credit and get an extra $100,000 in capital added to my line of credit, which would be right around a million dollars at this point once I add that. So it gives me twofold. It allows me more purchasing power to not have to crowdfund and just self-fund this myself, but it also allows me leverage to make money while it sits there as well. So itβs twofold.
Dave:
Makes a lot of sense. And you can always refinance it later if you want to either use a HELOC or whatever.
Nathan:
Or sell it.
Dave:
Exactly. So thatβs three out of the four. We talked about your PM costs, raising rents appropriately, and paying off some rentals. Whatβs the fourth thing youβve done?
Nathan:
My main focus this year is to wait for rates to drop in the five and a half range on either commercial or traditional financing or DSCR. Yaviβs a great place. I mean, Calviβs a really good company. They do a really good job, and you could use companies like that as well. But the thing is, if you could refinance your houses, say 23 houses, 10 of them are paid off, and I could actually refinance 10 of them. And I have so much equity from the appreciation thatβs been happening that I could take that appreciation, pay off another two or three that are free and clear, and still net an extra 100 to $500 a month in cashflow with doing that. That is a huge proponent to what Iβm trying to do right now. And if I do that and I do it smart, I should be able to pay off two houses and also save probably about $1,000 a month on that refinance.
Dave:
And
Nathan:
I think that weβll be in a position to do that.
Dave:
Even if the rateβs higher.
Nathan:
Yeah, even if the rateβs higher, for instance. Yeah, exactly. I think the rates will be in the five and a half to six and a quarter range, but if you buy it down a point, you should be in the realm that you need it, which is about 5.75, give or take to six. All
Dave:
Right. Well, yeah, if you could buy it down, youβre more optimistic than I am about getting into the fives. Iβm not so sure about that. Iβll average a little bit more than. I hope youβre right. I hope Iβm wrong. Yeah.
Nathan:
I hope we can get there. Weβll see what the market. I mean, thereβs a lot of things that are causing issues in the marketplace right now, but the goal that Iβve heard was a 1.5% Fed rate. And so weβre at a 3625, and Iβm in the mortgage industry, so this is what I know very well. And so if weβre at a 3625 and we need it at one and a half, I mean, if the rest of the world is at one and a half, we have to find a way to get that Fed rate down. And so theyβre really focused on that. So I am really leveraging my gambling hand here to say within the next hopefully 12 to 18 months, thatβs conservative. Okay. 12 To your point, if we could hit six, I think you would see a huge amount of people trying to refinance their properties.
And I think that would be very smart for them to do that in all honesty with you.
Dave:
Yeah. I mean, if we get to that rate, that makes a lot of sense to me. Weβll just have to see if we can get to that rate. Maybe 12 to 18 months. Iβm not as optimistic this year, about 2026 at least. Yeah,
Nathan:
This yearβs rough.
Dave:
Well, Nathan, this has been a lot of fun. Thank you so much for catching us up here. People want to connect with you, where should they do that?
Nathan:
Yeah, I mean, obviously you could find me online. Itβs RealEstateNate. Buy, Sell, Rent Coaching is my business in Louisville, Kentucky. You could find me on social media too under the same exact search term. So Iβm on social media, Iβm on LinkedIn, Iβm on everything that you could possibly think of, and also on Google search and stuff of that nature.
Dave:
Awesome. Well, thanks so much for being here, Nathan. We really appreciate you. And thank you all for listening. Again, if you want to check out DSCR loans, some of the things Nathan was talking about and youβre BiggerPockets Pro member, go to biggerpockets.com/pro and check out the discounted rates we have for you and weβve negotiated for you through Kiavi. Also, if you want to learn more from people like Nathan, make sure to subscribe to the BiggerPockets Podcast or follow us on YouTube so you never miss an episode. Thanks again for watching. Iβm Dave Meyer, and Iβll see you guys next time.
Help Us Out!
Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!
In This Episode We Cover:
- Why Nathan wonβt retire (yet), despite reaching financial freedom
- The repeatable strategy Nathan used to scale to 23 rental properties
- Four ways to increase cash flow across your rental portfolio (without more units!)
- The βnew one-percent ruleβ to use when analyzing rental properties
- When to start paying off your mortgages versus buying more properties
- And So Much More!
Links from the Show
Interested in learning more about todayβs sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [emailΒ protected].
Β



